@_xhr_
@rumpelsepp
This implication is simply bullshit.
I don't agree with #RMS on almost anything (not even the definition of free software which I consider too mild with corporations abuse).
But what happened at @fsf is disgusting.
Software is a form of expression.
Now we have the paradox of #FSF forcing #Stallman to resign for what he said. Not for anything he did, any crime he committed. Not as an effect of a due process.
Just for what he said.
The international crowd of cowards that lynched him over the #Web should lobby to get UN to institute an universal law on #ThoughtCrime so that #hackers will know which opinions cannot be expressed and will have the right to defend themselves in a court.
That's the final step to turn #hypocrisy into an actual evolutive advantage. I mean: at least people like #Epstein don't say what they DO!
Meanwhile what happened to Stallman shows that nobody really care about Universal Human Rights. Nobody ever read nor understood them. I think you should really read them twice. In particular articles 18, 19 and 12.
If you attack a man instead of his arguments, you might defeat the man but not the arguments.
Free Software Foundation
All status.fsf.org content and data are available under the 